What are teachers’ reasons for using differentiated homework, and what prevents them from doing so? A qualitative interview study.
Resource type
Journal Article
Status
Published
Recommended form of citation (APA)
Feiss, C., Hagenauer, G. & Moroni, S. (2025). What are teachers’ reasons for using differentiated homework, and what prevents them from doing so? A qualitative interview study. Teacher Development, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2025.2452637
Author(s)
External DOI
PHSG Organisation name
Project(s)
License Condition
CC BY 4.0 (International)
Proforis OA-status
Hybrid OA
OA-Acknowledgement
This OA publication was made possible by the R&P contracts of the Swiss University Consortium.
Topic PHSG
Schule und Profession
Fields of Science and Technology (OECD)
Education, general (including training, pedagogy, didactics)
Abstract
An important quality criterion of homework is fit, i.e. the optimal relationship between task requirements and the students’ abilities and interests. Fit can be achieved through differentiation. It has been found that few teachers give differentiated homework despite knowledge of its advantages. In light of this finding, the study conducted 23 semi-structured qualitative interviews with Swiss secondary school teachers to investigate whether teachers use differentiation measures for homework – and if so, which ones. The interviews explored teachers’ arguments and challenges surrounding the differentiation of homework, including the conditions required for the successful differentiation of homework. The results showed that only six teachers assigned differentiated homework regularly. In addition, the authors found that the interviewed teachers mentioned a variety of arguments and associated challenges and reported conditions for success that occur both at the individual teacher level and the structural level.
Version
Published Version
Access Rights
Open Access
License Condition
CC BY 4.0 (International)
Rights Holder
Author(s)