Podcasting as a Tool for Bridging the Gap Between Science and Practice
Resource type
Conference Paper not in Proceedings
Status
Accepted
Recommended form of citation (APA)
Quiring, J., & Ray, M. (2025, January 21-22). Podcasting as a Tool for Bridging the Gap Between Science and Practice [Poster presentation]. SSECR annual meeting, Basel.
Author(s)
PHSG Organisation name
Project(s)
License Condition
All rights reserved
Proforis OA-status
metadata only (bibliographisch)
Topic PHSG
Frühe Bildung 0 bis 8
Fields of Science and Technology (OECD)
Social sciences::Educational sciences::Education, general (including training, pedagogy, didactics)
Abstract
Currently there is scarce research on the use and benefits of podcasts for practitioners in the field of early childhood education and care (ECEC), but there is some evidence in the medical field that the use of podcasts results in knowledge retention and changes in practitioners’ behaviors (Kelly et al., 2022).
How to design the communication between science and practice within the podcast is one of the key questions when producing a podcast format for practitioners in ECEC.
Theoretical frameworks on the relationship between research and practice were compared for the design of the podcast format.
One of the main results is to consider scientific and professional practices as two separate practices with their respective characteristics, bodies of knowledge and potential benefits for each other (Leonhard, 2018). In this poster we present the implications of these results on the design of the podcast backed by user metrics. Viewing research and the professional field as independent practices, with their own forms of knowledge, and at the same time working on the points of reference seems to be a laborious but worthwhile approach that meets with broad acceptance among both experts and listeners.
How to design the communication between science and practice within the podcast is one of the key questions when producing a podcast format for practitioners in ECEC.
Theoretical frameworks on the relationship between research and practice were compared for the design of the podcast format.
One of the main results is to consider scientific and professional practices as two separate practices with their respective characteristics, bodies of knowledge and potential benefits for each other (Leonhard, 2018). In this poster we present the implications of these results on the design of the podcast backed by user metrics. Viewing research and the professional field as independent practices, with their own forms of knowledge, and at the same time working on the points of reference seems to be a laborious but worthwhile approach that meets with broad acceptance among both experts and listeners.
| Name of the event | Conference Host | Place of the event | Start date of the event | End date of the event |
SSECR annual meeting | Swiss Society for Early Childhood Research (SSECR) | University Psychiatric Clinics (UPK) Basel | January 21, 2025 | January 22, 2025 |
Access Rights
metadata only (bibliographisch)
License Condition
All rights reserved
Rights Holder
Author(s)