Repository logo
English
Deutsch
Log In(current)
  1. Home
  2. #Proforis
  3. Publication
  4. Where is the wolf? A multi‐method comparison of social values and perceptions in a Swiss park

Where is the wolf? A multi‐method comparison of social values and perceptions in a Swiss park

Resource type
Journal Article
Status
Published
Recommended form of citation (APA)
Cracco, M., Michel, A. H., Komossa, F., Kong, I., Backhaus, N., Thaler, L., Oliveri, T., & Walters, G. (2024). Where is the wolf? A multi‐method comparison of social values and perceptions in a Swiss park. Wildlife Biology, (6). https://doi.org/10.1002/wlb3.01267
Author(s)
Cracco, Marina
Michel, Annina  
Komossa, Franziska
Kong, Inhye
Backhaus, Norman
Thaler, Lucia
Oliveri, Timo
Walters, Gretchen
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18747/phsg-proforis/1608
External DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/wlb3.01267
PHSG Organisation name
Institut Gesellschaftswissenschaftliche Bildung  
Project(s)
Keinem PHSG-Projekt zugeordnet  
License Condition
CC BY 4.0 (International)
License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Proforis OA-status
Gold OA
Permalink
https://proforis.phsg.ch/handle/20.500.14111/5759
File(s)
Main Article: Cracco et al 2024 Multi‐method comparison of social values and perceptions.pdf (1.04 MB)
  • Details
Topic PHSG
Räume, Zeiten, Gesellschaften (RZG)
Subjects

Conservation

group discussions

interviews

media

micro-narratives

mixed methods

park

perceptions

sensitive issue

social value

survey

triangulation

wolf

Fields of Science and Technology (OECD)
Environmental sciences (social aspects)
Abstract
This article presents our recent experience studying public perceptions, discourses, and social values in Park Beverin, a Regional Nature Park in Switzerland. We applied four social research methods (news media analysis, survey with micro‐narratives, go‐along interviews, and focus groups), and delved into the subject of wolf Canis lupus adapting a triangulation protocol and systematic process from the health sciences. We observed the recurring perceptions of ‘wolf' throughout three of the four methods; however, depictions, values, prominence, and presence varied by method. Social values of the wolf were mostly silent when compared to other topics, and ‘wolf amplification' and ‘wolf fatigue' point to the need to rethink the social aspects in wolf management, conservation, and policy. The findings also show the need for diverse research methods for revealing social values and perceptions on sensitive topics that otherwise the use of one method may be masking or amplifying.
Additional Information
Diese Publikation erschien im Rahmen des PHSG-externen Projekts ValPar.CH .
PHSG Organisation name
Institut Gesellschaftswissenschaftliche Bildung  
Project(s)
Keinem PHSG-Projekt zugeordnet  
Version
Published Version
Access Rights
Open Access
License Condition
CC BY 4.0 (International)
Rights Holder
Author(s)

#Proforis - Pädagogische Hochschule St.Gallen

💻 Tutorials and FAQ on Proforis Sharepoint

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Accessibility settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
Repository logo COAR Notify